Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?

From: byteboy (byteboy@simons-rock.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 10 1997 - 17:21:05 MST

• Next message: Geoff Smith: "Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?"
• Previous message: Kennita Watson: "[Fwd: Scientists block menopause]"
• In reply to: Steve Witham: "Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?"
• Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks for clearing that up for me, I was under the assumption that
surreal numbers had more than one notation for the various different
surreal numbers. Suffice it to say, I missed the mark. Thanks for the
correction.

-byte
www.teknopia.org

• Next message: Geoff Smith: "Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?"
• Previous message: Kennita Watson: "[Fwd: Scientists block menopause]"
• In reply to: Steve Witham: "Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?"
• Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:07 MST