From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Wed Oct 29 1997 - 02:31:59 MST
Overall, it seems that the best way of living longer is CR combined
with a suitable level of exercise. The body can handle free radicals
quite well, and the small increase due to the exercise is offset by
the improvements in health.
Paul Wakfer <70023.3041@compuserve.com> writes:
> Most foods and vitamins/nutrients, etc. must go throught the
> digestive system and the liver to be assimulated properly. You
> cannot get a complete enough diet by parenteral feeding. It is
> a dangerous and impossible long term practice and would be
> extremely foolish to initiate voluntarily.
That an ordinary healthy human should not try a parenteral diet is
fairly obvious (what is the point, really?), but as far I know there
are a few people who have survived on a parenteral diet for years
after massive intestinal failure.
> >Keep high oxygen saturation to reduce work by heart and diaphram.
>
> Your oxygen saturation is already as high as you can possibly use.
> On the contrary, if anything you may want to *reduce* the amount
> of oxygen intake (as long as all areas of the tissues are equally
> supplied) and the subsequent amount of free radicals generated.
> I have often wondered if people who live their lives at moderately
> high altitudes may have increase longevity.
But doesn't the lung capacity and red blood cell count increase,
leading to a similar oxygen saturation?
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:04 MST