From: Dan Clemmensen (Dan@Clemmensen.ShireNet.com)
Date: Sat Sep 06 1997 - 20:26:02 MDT
CALYK@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 97-09-06 16:33:54 EDT, you write:
>
> << >3. Unintentional gray goo is not a serious problem.
> >>
>
> Not if you dont mind being slowly eaten alive.
>
> danny
I took the original assertion to mean that, since we must
defend against intentionally malevolent goo, we would therefore
not need to worry separately about unintentionally destructinve
goo because the same defense would also work against the
lesser threat.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:49 MST