From: Natasha V. More (fka Nancie Clark) (natasha@extropic-art.com)
Date: Mon Aug 18 1997 - 14:27:46 MDT
At 11:33 AM 8/18/97 -0700, Robin Hanson wrote:
>If one has "obvious sexiness", then one is likely is demand.
Not necessarily. One might not *want* to be in demand. Being in demand
only means that the view is happy, not the author: such as being in demand
by sub-human criteria.
>And one can easily be very frustrated if unable to participate for
>whatever reason.
Ok. Individual choice. Although, perhaps the participation might be less
than it is cranked up to be.
>I agree here with Steve who said:
>>things like embarrassment, rejection, disease, alienation,
>>psychological warfare within couples ... If people talk about
>>variations on those things, I (e.g.) might overcome my squeemishness
>>and pay attention.
Sounds good. Keep talking.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:44 MST