The Feeling of the Thought

From: Rick Knight (rknight@platinum.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 1997 - 00:04:29 MDT


     After perusing Robin Hanson's work "If Uploads Come First" (and I do
     plan to give it a more concerted read when it's not competing with my
     first listen of Kenny Loggins' new CD <G>), I began doing some
     surfing. I'm planning to add "Escape Velocity" to my list of upcoming
     reads (a speed reading course is starting to sound practical right
     about now).
     I came across a URL with an article by Andrew Brown entitled "How to
     make a soul":
     
     "There is no doubt that the process of learning from the outside is
     getting better and better. You can use a brain scanner to look inside
     someone's head while he learns a poem or recites one back. You can see
     which parts of the brain are working, and how hard. But even if these
     scanners could track each signal in each of the brain's billions of
     cells, they would still not explain why that activity should feel the
     way it does. People may, someday, be able to find which pattern of
     neurons firing makes up a thought. But what does that tell you about
     consciousness, about the feeling of the thought? "
     
     I think that the last statement is definitely the rub for me and my
     particular hold out in jumping on the pro-popcicle brigade
     (condescension would be interpreted, just being whimsical). I don't
     particularly desire being convinced and I don't mind being regarded as
     a foolish traditionalist who blithely accepts the fate dealt to the
     billions before this generation with its potentially life-extending
     technologies: the uploading of consciousness, the cryogenic suspension
     of physical matter, etc..
     
     Are thoughts just states and balances of chemicals, suspended neurons
     who are firing at a precise frequency and/or wattage. I don't have
     scientific terms to offer here. But I am left cold (no pun intended,
     well, yes, now that I think of it, it works...<G>) by the notion that
     any part of me could be reanimated and the "me" that commanded the
     body would just return to a conscious state. Presumably, "I" would
     have the same lack of awareness of time passing as when I hit my
     snooze for a few extra minutes of pre-awakening bliss only to hear the
     radio blast after what seems like a few seconds.
     
     Perhaps these topics have been ground down to their banal fundamentals
     in this digest and maybe I have some more research to do before I so
     casually dismiss the fervor of the life extension proponents.
     
     Rick



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:41 MST