Re: Meme supremacy (was: Re: A possible use of genetics...

From: EvMick@aol.com
Date: Thu Jul 31 1997 - 09:13:56 MDT

Next message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: About other universes: Replying..."
Previous message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: MIXILS? Nanofog/MEMS in SCIENCE NEWS"
Maybe in reply to: den Otter: "Meme supremacy (was: Re: A possible use of genetics..."
Next in thread: dalec@socrates.berkeley.edu: "Re: Meme supremacy (was: Re: A possible use of genetics..."
Reply: dalec@socrates.berkeley.edu: "Re: Meme supremacy (was: Re: A possible use of genetics..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 97-07-30 23:18:47 EDT, you write:

<< Dumb people
are very likely to "get involved" with stupid and destructive memes
like religion, communism, fascism etc, and may very well become
a serious threat to the evolving transhuman. >>

As an aside...would you define some terms for me please...I think I know what
they mean...but ...

relegion, communism, fascism..

Thanks..

EvMick

Next message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: About other universes: Replying..."
Previous message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: MIXILS? Nanofog/MEMS in SCIENCE NEWS"
Maybe in reply to: den Otter: "Meme supremacy (was: Re: A possible use of genetics..."
Next in thread: dalec@socrates.berkeley.edu: "Re: Meme supremacy (was: Re: A possible use of genetics..."
Reply: dalec@socrates.berkeley.edu: "Re: Meme supremacy (was: Re: A possible use of genetics..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:40 MST