From: Joshua F. McMichael (joshua@jmcmichael.com)
Date: Sun Jul 06 1997 - 07:40:25 MDT
This last message I sent out was a fragment - the beginning of a larger
discussion. Hagbard had given me the link to an intro to E-Prime, and I
grabbed the quote from that. My emailer sometimes mails out unfinished
pieces for some reason. Oops.
>Hagbard,
>
>
>
>>(1) Noun Phrase-1 + TO BE + Noun Phrase-2 (Identity)
>
>>(2) Noun Phrase-1 + TO BE + Adjective Phrase-1 (Predication)
>
>>where TO BE represents an appropriately inflected form of the verb "to be."
>
>>Critical thinkers have argued against using statements having the structure
of
>>(1) because they *immediately produce high order abstractions* that lead the
>user to premature judgments.
>
>Hmm... seems to me that the whole purpose of learning is to "immediately
>produce high order abstractions". Are you against forming high order
>abstractions?
Joshua McMichael
email: joshua@jmcmichael.com web: http://www.jmcmichael.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:33 MST