(no subject)

From: Rick Knight (rknight@platinum.com)
Date: Thu Jun 26 1997 - 10:21:50 MDT


     Ken Alexander wrote:
     
     Scott Adams starts the chapter off with a seemingly random unsupported
     slam against evolution, but then gets far wackier. He starts talking
     about psychic powers, luck as a commodity, and how repeating an
     affirmation 15 times a day can alter the very nature of reality due to
     new discoveries in quantum mechanics and multiple-universe theory.
     
     I think he should stick to lampooning corporations instead...
     
     
     I respond:
     
     Why? Did Scott hit a nerve by extolling something too etherial and
     outlandish? How dare the icon of the nerd community go out on such a
     whacko limb as to envision the impossible or at least
     yet-to-be-proven. Bohm and Sheldrake have some very interesting
     things to say about the effect of thought on reality, quantum
     mechanics, morphogenic fields and the like. It's not so easily
     dismissable. At least no more dismissable than Drexler if someone
     wants to take a staunch pragmatic line. Open up to possibility.
     Refer to Michael Lorrey's quotes on the absolutist statements made by
     people in respected positions over the last century. We live in
     extraordinary times!
     
     Rick



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:32 MST