From: I William Wiser (wwiser@best.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 1997 - 17:32:46 MDT
At 10:08 AM 6/19/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Holding constant the IQ variance but extending lifespan, would income
>variance at the end increase? That is, the longer time you have to
>work and invest in learning things, the more benefit you can get out
>of your higher IQ? Or would the same income variance spread out over
>a longer time scale?
For some groups there is a correlation between income and IQ over a
number of decades. If we postulate that there is some factor that
causes both higher IQ and higher income it seems likely that the
income results will compound over time.
>Varing the IQ variance for a fixed lifespan, is there some maximum IQ
>beyond which IQ doesn't help income within the lifespan, so that
>longer lifespans are required to take advantage of it?
I don't think IQ differences above a certain level are meaningful but
let's assume they are or deal with IQ's below that level. Given a
large number of income generating puzzles some percentage of them
will benefit from a higher IQ, the more difficult one's coming up
less frequently. Again I think the compound interest analogy is good
with very high IQs adding small percentages which take a long time to
become significant.
>Or am I tring to read too much into a few noisy data points?
There is a lot of IQ and income data out there so I suspect you could
develop a number of testable hypotheses. It is interesting but
I can't think how the results would be useful. In any case I doubt
you will get a chance to reap the full benefits of your own prodigious
IQ before intelligence increasing technology becomes widely available.
-- I. William Wiser <wwiser@best.com> Longevity Consultant
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:30 MST