Deplorable New Age Myths

From: Rick Knight (rknight@platinum.com)
Date: Tue Jun 10 1997 - 10:06:33 MDT


     Mark Crosby wrote:
     
     "This sounds no different to me from the Christian Apocalypse &
     Resurrection. We're supposed to regress back into the womb, the void,
     from everything back to nothing, renouncing our worldly 'sins'! Isn't
     that wonderful? This is the death wish most whimpish religions aspire
     to rather than the rough and tumble, creative destruction of a truly
     pluralistic extropian universe. (It's also why I sometimes hanker for
     heroes and am eager to believe in boundaries for borganisms, and for
     creepy nanofog clouds of grey-goo clones out to consume the
     cosmos...)"
     
     Rick responds:
     
     Not to make a pun, but playing the "devil's advocate" here, I can draw
     a few parallels to regular old existence that render the whimpy
     regression archetype fairly innocuous.
     
     First of all, I maintain that order and novelty seem to ongoingly
     emerge across the millions of years of cosmic time. Or at least
     that's how it seems. First there was nothing (or something we call
     nothing), then basic elements and gases, crude matter, hot stars,
     cooling planets, water, vegetation and microscopic organisms, fishes,
     etc.. all the way to hefty brain-stemed HOMO SAPIEN (this one, BTW,
     takes issue with all the flap about training apes for their
     rudimentary service potential and agree that it is probably their
     level of intelligence and curiosity that renders them slave-exempt).
     
     Anyway, so the ongoing evolution that we have theorized has brought us
     to the threshold of human transcendence may just be one long
     inhalation in cosmic time. There are so many metaphors for cycle, the
     on and off, the to and fro of things. Granted, some of these cycles
     may be so vast as to not warrant our attention. But then that begs
     the question as to why it's even necessary to spend an ounce of energy
     despising myths or religious doctrines.
     
     The only reason I know of is unresolved stuff from an oppressed
     upbringing (mine was Southern Baptist but not ANAL WHACKO Southern
     Baptist, just quaint and inconsistent Southern Baptist). It certainly
     did a number on me determining where/how I fit in and took a number of
     years to figure out that sexuality choices do not equal an eternity in
     some corner of the universe where I'm destined to suffer in pain.
     Like I said, "quaint".
     
     Certainly, such cosmic cycles (if they exist at all) give extropian
     thinking plenty of elbow room to expand into unimaginable creatures.
     Still, I can't help but have some connection to the LILA myth since a
     psychedlic trip I had several years ago. In this dream state, I was
     pulling away layers of space as if they were wallpaper. I *knew* that
     once I got to the last layer of space, all the answers would be on the
     other side. As I tore at what I were sure were the last layers of the
     farthest regions of the known universe, I had tremendous anticipation.
      I ripped away the final layer and whadaya know, ANOTHER UNIVERSE!
     This is going to take an exhaustively long time I thought and I was
     very disappointed. At that point I asked myself (or was it
     communicated to me), "why would you want to know all the answers, what
     point would there be then?"
     
     Frankly, thinking too much and too often makes me rather tired and
     despondent. That's why I perceive it important to keep balance,
     breathe in and exhale out. Quest then rest. If the Universe is just
     a big organic (?) diaphragm of cycling energy, then I'm okay with
     that. But I still get a little annoyed with the fundie that thinks my
     "lifestyle" is going to make eternity a hot and unpleasant prospect.
     
     Regards,
     
     
     Rick Knight
     
     



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:28 MST