From: Enigl@aol.com
Date: Thu Mar 06 1997 - 22:11:44 MST
In a message dated 97-03-05 13:26:52 EST, you write:
<< >
>I reject the theory that HIV causes AIDS on the grounds
>that it violates so many established principles of virology. >>
I don't know of any "violations" yet in print and I have read Peter Duesberg,
Bryan Ellison, and Robert Root-Bernstein. I _did_ like the article they
wrote and that makes me feel more like going against the grain (and being
more creative).
Robert Root-Bernstein actually writes that HIV _might_ cause AIDS in some
cases. he is more open minded, creative and pan-critically rational.
Duesberg and Ellison reject HIV 100%. This is leaving nothing to discuss but
a nice money making lecture and book market for themselves based on stiring
up controversial subjects (not unlike Jerry Riffkin's controversial-lecture
business).
Neither will admit any HIV involvement in AIDS.
For an "END POINT" in the "research futures" I would like to see HIV proven
to be 100% not involved in any way with AIDS infection as a vindication of
the skeptic's claims.
Davin C. Enigl, (Sole Proprietorship) MEAS
President-Microbiologist
Microbiology Consulting, Hazard Analysis and
Critical Control Points (HACCP), CGMP, and Validations
for the Food, Cosmetic, Nutritional Supplement, and Pharmaceutical Industry
enigl@aol.com
http://members.aol.com/enigl/index.html
March 6, 1997
8:22 pm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:14 MST