From: Robin Hanson (hanson@hss.caltech.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 18 1997 - 13:55:44 MST
Lee Daniel Crocker writes:
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "debunked". Coase has certainly not
>> proved that torts do better than legislatures at dealing with
>> externalities and public goods/bads.
>
>Again, that presupposes a definition of "better". What Coase showed
>was that in a free market, the very idea of "public good" is a myth.
>Any initial assignment of property rights will result in an efficient
>solution in a free market, subject only to transaction costs.
The very idea of a public good does not imply anything else, and so is
not a myth. The standard economic concept of a public good is only
meant to delimit a certain set of situations, and does by itself imply
what the best way to deal with them is.
Robin D. Hanson hanson@hss.caltech.edu http://hss.caltech.edu/~hanson/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:11 MST