Re: Linguists Of The Apocalyp's, unite!

From: Eliezer Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Sat Feb 01 1997 - 19:46:07 MST

Next message: Paul Dietz: "Re: Wireless Electricity -- Bunk? ( Nope!"
Previous message: Paul Dietz: "Re: Wireless Electricity -- Bunk? ( Nope!"
In reply to: Damien Broderick: "Re: Linguists Of The Apocalyp's, unite!"
Next in thread: The Low Willow: "Re: Linguists Of The Apocalyp's, unite!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Wrong Damien. That's the one with the shillelagh. But his thoughts are
> often eerily aligned with mine. (And he writes well, a fine fellow.)
>
> D. Broderick, for but not on behalf of the Little People

Wait a minute! There are two Damiens?

THAT explains a whole lot. Great. Now I've got to go through all my
saved messages and try to differentiate you two. Sheesh, even "Max M"
and "Max More" are easily distinguishable by message formatting.

-- 
         sentience@pobox.com      Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
          http://tezcat.com/~eliezer/singularity.html
           http://tezcat.com/~eliezer/algernon.html
Disclaimer:  Unless otherwise specified, I'm not telling you
everything I think I know.

Next message: Paul Dietz: "Re: Wireless Electricity -- Bunk? ( Nope!"
Previous message: Paul Dietz: "Re: Wireless Electricity -- Bunk? ( Nope!"
In reply to: Damien Broderick: "Re: Linguists Of The Apocalyp's, unite!"
Next in thread: The Low Willow: "Re: Linguists Of The Apocalyp's, unite!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:07 MST