From: Hal Finney (hal@rain.org)
Date: Thu Jan 23 1997 - 23:36:24 MST
From: Damien Broderick <damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
> Hal comments:
>
> > A commercial jet flying at 10000 m will therefore have a
> >speedup due to GR of about 10^-10. This is an order of magnitude more
> >than the relativistic slowdown of even the mile per second plane, so
> >it will swamp that effect in normal situations.
>
> This has been an empirical issue for many years. A quick hunt of my shelves
> does not locate the detailed account, which I recall showed a (very small)
> overall loss of time in the airborne clock. Britannica says: `The
> clock-paradox effect also has been substantiated by experiments comparing
> the elapsed time of an atomic clock on Earth with that of an atomic clock
> flown in an airplane. The latter experiments. furthermore, have confirmed a
> gravitational contribution to time dilation, as predicted by the theory of
> general relativity.' No plus or minus signs, damn it, but presumably if the
> joint effect had conformed with Hal's estimate this would have deserved
> mention in the EB.
I'm sorry, I made a numerical error and used a value of c that was a
factor of 10 too low. Actually g/c^2 is about 10^-16 per meter and
so at 10000 m the gravitational speedup would be 10^-12. This puts
the relativistic slowdown back in the lead since it was about 10^-11,
although Eliezer's plane was going pretty darn fast (nearly at orbital
velocity). For ordinary commercial jets it looks like the relativistic
slowdown just about cancels the gravitational speedup!
Hal
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:03 MST