Re: (Fwd) Re: guidelines/ethics

From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lcrocker@calweb.com)
Date: Sun Dec 22 1996 - 17:50:56 MST


> Obviously, you misunderstood. I was referring to good science, while
> medicine does not qualify as science at all.

Am I missing sarcasm here, or do you really think there is some
connection between that slander and reality? I think the /millions/
of lives saved by good, rational, science in medicine over the
last few decades, despite the public's continued fascination with
mystical bullshit like astrology, homeopathy, and "alternative"
medicines are more than sufficient evidence.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:55 MST