Re: the robot scenario

From: Max M (maxmcorp@inet.uni-c.dk)
Date: Sun Dec 22 1996 - 16:37:26 MST

• Next message: Natasha V. More(f/k/a/Nancie Clark): "Book: Re: Brin on privacy"
• Previous message: Max M: "Re: twinkle, twinkle"
• Maybe in reply to: Max M: "the robot scenario"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> From: Roderick A. Carder-Russell
> > > Max M wrote:
> > > Does the scenario hold and what is the reason then for us as
biological
> > > beings to go to space and live eternal lives?
>
> What one should look at in this statement is "...for us *as*
> biological beings...". SNIP .... Desire for life and knowledge is more
than enough.
>

I Agree. I were just dipping my toes te get to know people on the list, and
the post was done a while back now.

MAX M Rasmussen
New Media Director

Private: maxmcorp@inet.uni-c.dk
         http://inet.uni-c.dk/~maxmcorp

Work: maxm@novavision.dk
         http://www.novavision.dk/

This is my way cool signature message!!

• Next message: Natasha V. More(f/k/a/Nancie Clark): "Book: Re: Brin on privacy"
• Previous message: Max M: "Re: twinkle, twinkle"
• Maybe in reply to: Max M: "the robot scenario"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:55 MST