Re: (Fwd) Re: guidelines/ethics

From: QueeneMUSE@aol.com
Date: Sat Dec 21 1996 - 08:37:56 MST


<< evolutionary psychology, sociology, psychology, gender studies,
> etc. based on the realization that a lot of the prevailing paradigms
> were skewed to the biases of the male researchers. This isn't to
 
> Maybe these "sciences" weren't that scientific, after all. Strong
 operator signature is a sign of sloppy experimentation, if not dire fraud.
 Good science is operator-neutral, which should be provable in a
 double-blind. >>

For anyone interested in this subject, I just finished Steven Jay Gould's
book
"THE MISMEASURE OF MAN".

Although I am also not sure he isnt also biased ; - )...
It is really amazing just what some "respected scientists" have come up with
when they are trying to validate the cultural status quo.

N



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:54 MST