From: James Rogers (jamesr@best.com)
Date: Wed Dec 04 1996 - 15:01:52 MST
At 11:58 AM 12/4/96 -0800, you wrote:
>From: James Rogers <jamesr@best.com>
>> There is a type of "active" composite that has the properties you are
>> describing. It is a laminate composite consisting of piezo-electric
>> ceramics and shape-memory alloys from the nickel-titanium family.
>>
>> When vibrations hit the ceramic outer laminate, the ceramic acts as a
>> transducer, converting the vibration into an electrical signal. The signal
>> is inverted (It may be inverted via an anisotropic material property. I am
>> not sure.) and fed into the shape-memory alloy. The alloy flexes and
>> reproduces the inverted signal, similar to a speaker, through the ceramic.
>
>This is an interesting discussion, which I unfortunately don't know enough
>solid state physics to contribute to.
>
>However my instincts are that some of these ideas are based on a macroscopic
>model which won't work at the level we are talking about. These atomic
>vibrations are themselves heat. The notion of going in and producing
>counter vibrations which will cancel these smacks of violating the Third
>Law.
You are probably correct. I am not sure at what point these properties
would be irrelevant. I guess it would depend on exactly how "macro" your
nanostructure was.
One possible solution is to use magnetic fields for cooling. I know this is
done for ultra-cool liquid Helium applications. 1) Use the dipole moment of
the atom to restrict its motion (like a magnetic bottle), or 2) Increase the
entropy (and therefore decrease the enthalpy) of the system by using a
switched magnetic field.
How this would be implemented on a nano scale is not so clear to me...
-James Rogers
jamesr@best.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:52 MST