Re: God

From: E. Shaun Russell (e_shaun@uniserve.com)
Date: Thu Nov 14 1996 - 17:39:47 MST


On 14/11/96, Lyle wrote:

>I particularly like the fact that you didn't say God was omnipotent or
>omniscient.

        Indeed. I think we should have a definition of 'atheist'. I
consider myself an atheist because I don't believe in a conventional 'God'.
I am very open to other thoughts however, and the general term of
atheist has a synonym of 'closed-minded'. Go figure.

>2. A point of eristic strategy: in a field were arguments easily
>degenerate into semantic arguments, it is a good idea to invent new
>terminology instead of using words that carry a lot of baggage,
>such as the G-word.

        It still doesn't change the meaning, though. 'God' is short and
convenient to use, as well as widely known. I don't see the reason for
creating a new word for this.

                                        Ingredi Externus!

                                                -E. Shaun Russell

                        ---signature file is in limbo---



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:50 MST