Re: TW A not A?

From: Sarah Marr (sarah.marr@dial.pipex.com)
Date: Wed Nov 13 1996 - 12:49:22 MST

Next message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Poetry Breakdown- retaliatory poem #2 (for E.)"
Previous message: John K Clark: "God"
Maybe in reply to: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: TW A not A?"
Next in thread: Ian Goddard: "Re: TW A not A?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 02:54 13/11/96 -0500, Nadia wrote:

>I know, it's a conspiracy.
>Can we switch back to A not A again? At least Sarah writes to that one...

Although, of course, you only know I write to it by comparing that state
with the imagined state of my _not_ writing to it. Right?

(Or not right?)

Sarah

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sarah Kathryn Marr
sarah.marr@dial.pipex.com http://dialspace.dial.pipex.com/sarah.marr/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Poetry Breakdown- retaliatory poem #2 (for E.)"
Previous message: John K Clark: "God"
Maybe in reply to: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: TW A not A?"
Next in thread: Ian Goddard: "Re: TW A not A?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:50 MST