Re: Nanotechnology Progress

From: Eliezer Yudkowsky (eliezer@pobox.com)
Date: Sun Nov 10 1996 - 18:13:49 MST

• Next message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: The Worker / Employer Relationship"
• Previous message: E. Shaun Russell: "Re: Being Artificially Intelligent"
• Maybe in reply to: John K Clark: "Nanotechnology Progress"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

1-cm by 1-mm STM nanotech?
Next year?
Singularity speculation?
How about: "Looks like my estimate of 2005 was a bit conservative."

YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES!

I don't believe it - it looks like we might actually make it!

• Next message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: The Worker / Employer Relationship"
• Previous message: E. Shaun Russell: "Re: Being Artificially Intelligent"
• Maybe in reply to: John K Clark: "Nanotechnology Progress"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:50 MST