From: Peter C. McCluskey (pcm@rahul.net)
Date: Sat Nov 02 1996 - 17:02:09 MST
jamesr@best.com (jamesr@best.com) writes:
>Yes, but I think that most people here want to *experience* the
>upload, not generate a bunch of clones who *think* they were
>uploaded. In a destructive upload, our stream of consciousness would
>cease to exist. We would be dead and there would be a computer
>program running that would swear it was us, and would in fact be us,
>albeit running on a separate stream of consciousness.
Just like a stream of consciousness ceases when I go to sleep
and a separate stream of consciousness is created when my body
wakes up? There will probably be something unique about the
discontinuity involved in uploading, but I have heard no reason
to expect that the mind which uploading produces lacks anything
that the mind which will inhabit my body after a more familiar
discontinuity has.
> I don't think
>too many people would terminate their own stream of consciousness to
>create new independant ones. What would be the advantage?
Greater wealth through the ability to work at faster clock speeds.
More security through the ability to make distributed backups.
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Peter McCluskey | "Don't blame me. I voted for Kodos." - Homer Simpson pcm@rahul.net | http://www.rahul.net/pcm | Vote Libertarian! See pcm@quote.com | http://www.quote.com | www.lp.org for more info.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:49 MST