From: E. Shaun Russell (e_shaun@uniserve.com)
Date: Sun Oct 13 1996 - 20:31:39 MDT
On 13\10\96, GBurchl wrote:
>The "relevance" concern raises a different set of questions. Is this, as E.
>Shaun Russell points out, to be a forum only for "...well thought out,
>extropian discussion"?
I guess it depends on what people see as well thought out extropian
discussion.
>I think that -- with the use of a little judgment -- we should tolerate the
>occasional quip, pun (thank you, Hara Ra, for many a smile) and irrelevant
>discussion.
No doubt. I just think that a signature file might deserve a
comment, but not multiple responses. It's that signal to noise ratio. It
would be nice if it stayed around 90%\10% or 95%\5%. A little cream with
the coffee, so to speak.
Ingredi Externus!
-E. Shaun Russell
_____________________________________________________________________________
E. Shaun Russell Extropian poet\musician
e_shaun@uniserve.com
_____________________________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:47 MST