Is the thought of a unicorn a real thought?

From: Dennis Kaffenberger (denkaff@concentric.net)
Date: Sat Sep 28 1996 - 11:40:20 MDT


> > our fantasies and imagination are objective, in the
> > sense that they are actually occuring inside our own heads.
>
> "Our fantasies and imagination are subjective, in the sense
> that they are actually occuring inside our own heads."

        Who says that our fantasies and imagination are happening
        inside our heads? They could be happening inside the big
        toe of the guy down the street, for all that it matters.

     Objective: Being the object of perception or thought;
        belonging to the object of thought rather than the
        thinking subject.

     Subjective: Existing in the mind; belonging to the
        thinking subject rather than to the object of thought.

        -Both- are happening as a result of the mind*. It is
        only when two or more people get together that the
        distinction between objective/perception and
        subjective/creation become important. Otherwise
        fantasies and realities might as well be the same.

        * Please note that I did not use the term inside,
        which is where I believe that most of the confusion is
        coming from. To say that a seemingly intangable thing
        'is somewhere' leads to misconceptions, and strange loops
        of logic. I am not sure if a thought is an electron
        crusing around a neuron, or if it is something completely
        untangable. Also, electrons only seem to exist, I do not
        claim to know for sure if they do or do not exist.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:46 MST