Re: Darwinian Extropy

From: E. Shaun Russell (e_shaun@uniserve.com)
Date: Sun Sep 08 1996 - 21:30:39 MDT


At 04:56 08/09/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>Point being, that a hyperintelligent mind is likely to be less subject to
>>mathematical behavior analysis than we are, not less. It's likely to be
>>less "logical" in it's reasons, that the arbitrariness of humanity. It's
>>certain to be more complex. A "social" group of such >H minds is likely
>>to be unfathenable in its behavior--and perhaps very inefficient and
>>illogical to outside analysis indeed.
>Could this mean that the culture of mysticism and it's illogical behavior
>could mean that people who believe in such are ahead of the rest of us??
>People believing in mysticism tap into many more emotions than atheists
>through "religious experiences". Is that where we're headed? Is religion a
>natural part of culture and intelligence except now due to our ability to
>control our fate, WE ARE BECOMING the gods through transhumanism?

                                                   
        Who said anything about *becoming* gods? (:-)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:44 MST