Re: Buckminster-Fullerene

From: Sarah Marr (sarah.marr@dial.pipex.com)
Date: Mon Sep 02 1996 - 04:11:03 MDT


At 19:08 01/09/96 -0700, Forrest Bishop wrote:
>You wrote:
>>[re BMFullerene]
>
>check out the Elctrochemical Society's Fullerene Group at
>http://www.electrochem.org/ecs/divisions/fullerenes.html

Thanks. I'll do that.

>>[R. Artym ]Is there any reason to suspect that the electric field is at all
>>interesting beyond the normal bonding distances? I haven't seen it
>>discussed anywhere. What sparked your interest in this, Sarah?
>>
>
>To compute resonances of caged neutal atoms perhaps?
>
>There is some work on attaching ancillary structures to C60 or C70,
>which may lead to methods of attracting and trapping selected atoms
>or small molecules ( e. g. heavy metals). The electric field structure
>is central here.

Verrry clever, Meester Beeshop, but not quite cleverr eenough...

Actually, yeah, it is something along those lines. If anybody comes across
anything
on this please let me know.

Sarah

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Sarah Kathryn Marr
 sarah.marr@dial.pipex.com http://dialspace.dial.pipex.com/sarah.marr/
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:44 MST