Re: Buckminster-Fullerene

From: Dr. Rich Artym (rartym@galacta.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sun Sep 01 1996 - 16:33:27 MDT

Next message: Dr. Rich Artym: "Re: >H Dynamic Individual Freedom"
Previous message: Dr. Rich Artym: "Re: evolution and "I""
Maybe in reply to: Sarah Marr: "Buckminster-Fullerene"
Next in thread: Forrest Bishop: "Re: Buckminster-Fullerene"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In message <1.5.4.32.19960831214622.0067f1b4@pop.dial.pipex.com>,
Sarah Marr writes:

> Slightly tangential to normal discussions, perhaps, but does anyone know of
> a good source of information about the structure of Buckminster-Fullerene?
> I'm particularly interested in the properties of the electric field inside
> each 'Buckyball'.

Is there any reason to suspect that the electric field is at all
interesting beyond the normal bonding distances? I haven't seen it
discussed anywhere. What sparked your interest in this, Sarah?

Rich.

-- 
###########  Dr. Rich Artym  ================  PGP public key available
# galacta #  Email   : rich@galacta.demon.co.uk         158.152.156.137
# ->demon #  Web     : http://www.galacta.demon.co.uk   194.222.245.150
# ->ampr  #  AMPR    : rich@g7exm[.uk].ampr.org 44.131.164.1 BBS:GB7MSW
# ->NTS   #  Fun     : Unix, X, TCP/IP, kernel, O-O, C++, SoftEng, Nano
###########  More fun: Regional IP Coordinator Hertfordshire + N.London

Next message: Dr. Rich Artym: "Re: >H Dynamic Individual Freedom"
Previous message: Dr. Rich Artym: "Re: evolution and "I""
Maybe in reply to: Sarah Marr: "Buckminster-Fullerene"
Next in thread: Forrest Bishop: "Re: Buckminster-Fullerene"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:44 MST