From: QueeneMUSE@aol.com
Date: Fri Aug 30 1996 - 13:10:56 MDT
( nadia)
<<
> PS
> It may be none of my business, and I dont know if it was your intent, but
in
> light of all the unfair slander and abuse Max has taken lately ( in my
> opinion from people who are jealous or massively uninformed) this could be
> read as yet another, not so nice, not very well veiled - jab.
>
(russel)
>>>Nothing of the sort! I'm neither jealous nor uninformed. I'm informed
enough to continue as a board member of ExI, even. None of this is directed
at Max; I though that was clear. I simply take issue with those whose
first impulse in such situations is to call on someone else to do the
work of representation for them. This was directed at Chris, not Max.
>>
Of course, I did not mean that *you* were, but as is obvious - there are
(lately) those who have been less than rational or constructive - if not
blatantly ill mannered...
As I said I didnt know if your intent was to dis, but wanted to point
out that it could be read as such by those seeking to increase the level of
negative feedback. Thank you for the clarification.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:44 MST