From: Eric Watt Forste (arkuat@factory.net)
Date: Wed Aug 21 1996 - 00:20:54 MDT
>I find four Principles to be a much less attractive number than five. I
>don't think you could do it in three, and that number might be TOO stable
>to be a symbol for ExI. A symbol like the current logo but with four arrows
>would be rigid-looking as well as swastika-like. Four bad. Five good.
Wow! I'm glad you pointed this out! I forgot all about the original
horrible four-arrow extropy logo.
And you're right that as far as numerological symbolism is concerned, five
is a much better number for extropian ideas than four or three.
Eric Watt Forste <arkuat@pobox.com> http://www.c2.org/~arkuat/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:43 MST