Re: PEROT: Public Parasite

From: Horatius Cocles (horatius_cocles@nile.com)
Date: Mon Aug 19 1996 - 19:59:19 MDT


Ian Goddard <igoddard@erols.com>,Internet - nile.com writes:
                  PUBLIC WELFARE FOR

                BILLIONAIRE ROSS PEROT

By Ian Williams Goddard

Ross Perot may be a billionaire several times over thanks to large
government contracts, but that will not stop him from grabbing
as much of the taxpayers money as he can get his greedy little
hands on. As The Washington Post (8/19/96, A1) reports:

        VALLEY FORGE, Pa. Aug. 18 -- Billionaire Ross
        Perot accepted the presidential nomination of
        his new Reform Party tonight [ which evidence
        suggests may have been rigged ] and surprised
        his loyal followers by announcing that he will
        accept federal funds and contributions from
        individuals for his campaign instead of
        bankrolling it himself.

Ross Perot then condemned both Dole and Clinton for receiving
contributions from political action campaigns. Perot said,
"It is wrong. These guys are bought and paid for by the
special interests." Of course tax consuming billionaire
Ross Perot expects to be paid for by YOU -- whether
you like it or not.

Responding to Dole's claim to cut taxes, Perot said, "We
tried it in the '80s and it didn't work." Right, greedy
tax feeders like Perot gobbled up rising revenues twice
as fast as they came in, hence the debt. Perot continued
blasting tax cuts saying, "There's no free candy, no free
lunch." Except, that is, for Ross Perot a la the taxpayers.

If Ross Perot stands against the corrupt Washington D.C.
establishment, why is he defending its claim to seize
your property? It doesn't take a genius to see through
this transparent tax-consuming con man.

ALAS, THERE IS A SIGN OF HOPE ------

The first and only presidential candidate to qualify for
federal campaign matching funds and yet turn down this
opportunity to plunder the taxpayers is the Libertarian
Party candidate, Harry Browne. Principle over parasitic
public plunder. Surely, among the presidential candidates
the Libertarian Harry Browne stands alone on the moral
high ground. But is moral high ground what voters,
such as yourself, want?

******************************************************************
 visit GODDARD'S GALLERIA: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/art.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------
 some of the lanscapes, nudes, and visionary art of IAN W GODDARD
__________________________________________________________________

(c) Ian Williams Goddard -- free to copy article uncut nonprofit

Has Harry Browne come out for repudiating the phony "national debt" yet? If not,
why not? Does he really want the moral high ground?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:43 MST