Re: unsupported assertion about evolution

From: Nick Nicholas (raven@interramp.com)
Date: Tue Aug 06 1996 - 01:20:52 MDT


At 10:57 PM 8/2/96 -0500, you wrote:
>
>The issue here is not evolution, which is, like anything else, debatable.
>Darwin certainly didn't say the last word on the subject, and neither did
>Dawkins. Stuart Kauffman has introduced a whole new way of looking
>at evolution. But any statement of the form
>
>> X has been discredited, do your reading
>
>is bullshit. It would still be bullshit if someone said
>
>> Fundamentalism has been discredited, do your reading
>Quite corrrectt Lyle, The technique is called bating. The statemment per
ipse i incorrrect. I'm ttrying to get the trout to rise.

Medical problems tonight (seizure) will get back asap
Nick Nicholas
<raven@interramp.com>
<http://www.intr.net/raven>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:42 MST