From: Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Date: Mon Jul 29 1996 - 22:22:24 MDT
>Anders Sandberg :
>Why not? I have begun to dislike reification (= turning concepts into
>"things") lately; intelligence is not something you can increase (as if
>it was some golden liquid in our brains), it is the ability to act/think
>in an intelligent way. Extropy cannot be static, then it is not extropy.
>Remember that the word is based on "Ex" ("out") and the "tropos" (move).
>
OK, here's a proposed definition:
Define Ma, the mass raised above the atmosphere by human activity. (shuttles,
satellites, probes, etc). The tendency to do so is the derivative, ie,
d(Ma)/dt
I invite anyone with the required data and a strong interest in space to
look up the numbers and provide a yearly table, starting with Sputnik.
There are actually a series of derivatives here:
d(Ma)/dt - Mass into LEO and beyond
d(Mtev)/dt - Mass beyond Terran Escape Velocity (tev)
d(Msev)/dt - Ditto, Solar Escape Velocity
d(Mgev)/dt - Ditto, Galactic Escape Velocity
d(Mlgev)/dt -
d(Mu)/dt -
The last two are left as exercises for the reader....
For SETI enthusiasts, there is d(b)/dt, where b is bits....
O---------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
O---------------------------------O
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:42 MST