Re: Iraq: example to Iran, NK, Pakistan, India
From: Kai M. Becker (kmb@kai-m-becker.de)
Date: Mon Dec 16 2002 - 06:41:45 MST
- Next message: Dickey, Michael F: "RE: Noam Chomsky (was RE: joinThe American Peace Movement)"
- Previous message: ABlainey@aol.com: "Re: ...right to bear markers..."
- In reply to: Mitchell Porter: "Re: Iraq: example to Iran, NK, Pakistan, India"
- Next in thread: Mark Walker: "Re: Iraq: example to Iran, NK, Pakistan, India"
- Reply: Mark Walker: "Re: Iraq: example to Iran, NK, Pakistan, India"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
Mitchell Porter schrieb:
>
> As I see it, when it comes to the questions "Who sent the anthrax?"
> and "Why the focus on Iraq?" there are three theories doing the
> rounds. [Theory A, B, C] [...]
> There are other theories possible [...]
>
> I regard Theory B as implausible, because of the Florida
> connection. I regard Theory A as implausible, because the US
> government is clearly choosing not to highlight the Florida
> connection. That leaves Theory C.
As you state correctly, there are many more possible answers. But simple
deductive logic is not appropriate until one knows all N possible
answers and has negative proofs for N-1 of them. Therefore, your logic
is faulty.
Kai
- Next message: Dickey, Michael F: "RE: Noam Chomsky (was RE: joinThe American Peace Movement)"
- Previous message: ABlainey@aol.com: "Re: ...right to bear markers..."
- In reply to: Mitchell Porter: "Re: Iraq: example to Iran, NK, Pakistan, India"
- Next in thread: Mark Walker: "Re: Iraq: example to Iran, NK, Pakistan, India"
- Reply: Mark Walker: "Re: Iraq: example to Iran, NK, Pakistan, India"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:45 MST