From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 16:24:23 MST
Dehede011@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 12/4/2002 1:37:05 PM Central Standard Time,
> samantha@objectent.com writes: If you can refute Chomsky's views then that is
> one thing. But to accuse him or those who find his arguments convincing of
> lacking in logic or grasp of reality is ridiculous.
>
> Samantha,
> Can you recommend something by Chomsky that is political that you
> regard as logical and with a good grasp of reality? I have read him and
> based on that sample decided he was a babbling idiot. I won't extend myself
> very far to read him further but if you have something that is acceptable I
> will give him another trial -- on line would be best.
> Ron h.
You made the claim. You offer the evidence you consider
convincing. Otherwise please consider not making such broad and
inflammatory statements.
- samantha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:38 MST