From: gts (gts_2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 17:24:48 MST
Lee Corbin wrote:
> gts writes
>> That is not so if we define the measurement as taking place at
>> the moment of observation, which is how I define measurement
>> (along with Hugh Everett). Subject-0 splits into 1000 copies *in
>> the act of measurement*, not before it or after it.
>
> I have no idea what you are talking about.
Obviously.
> Forget measurements and observation in the QM sense. I'm asking how
any
> of the duplicates can observe anything if none of their neurons have
> time to fire?
And I'm telling you that their neurons have fired by virtue of their
different observations of their different realities. Those different
measurements of reality are coincidental to their duplication in the
first place, as per MWI. Before the observation there is only the single
original subject.
It seems to me that you want to ignore the physics of MWI because the
physics foil your argument. Yet in other threads you are eager to
promote MWI.
-gts
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:18 MST