Re: Drawing the Circle of Sentient Privilege (was RE: What's Important to Discuss)

From: Max M (maxmcorp@worldonline.dk)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 02:29:43 MST


Brett Paatsch wrote:

> Me either. I don't think there are moral absolutes, but maybe there are
> moral "universals". A universal would not be true for all time or in all
> situatuations (it would not be an absolute) but we may safelty be able to
> apply it or assume its true for nearly all persons.

The best description I have ever heard of morale, is as the opposite of
double morale.

I don't know if this direct DK -> US translation is correct. Perhaps it
is better translated with standards vs. double standards.

So Ethics and Moral are universal in the sense that if a moral standard
applies to you, it also applies to me.

Ie. You are not allowed to steal. So i'm not allowed to steal either.

I find this to be the best starting point for discussing absolute and
rational morales.

regards Max M Rasmussen, Denmark



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:17 MST