From: Amara Graps (amara@amara.com)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 01:31:22 MST
>What I oppose is arguments of the type "well, so and so
> is known to have no credentials", or "so and so is linked
> to bad web sites", or "so and so is a nobody", and "therefore
> so and so's arguments and points of view need not be
> entertained". It happens, and I'm afraid that it happens
> more than it once did.
I oppose the arguments where someone says he didn't read the paper that
he carries in his hand that actually list members referred him to previously
which answers all the questions that he continues to write. I also oppose
the arguments where a 5 minute Google search is an argument of proof
that such and such something does or does not exist.
You will of course believe what you want to believe, Lee. It is always
easier to belive one's own spin and elaborate theories rather than
someone else's plainly written words.
Amara Graps
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:15 MST