Re: What's Important to Discuss (was FRUITLESS: duck me!

From: spike66 (spike66@attbi.com)
Date: Mon Nov 18 2002 - 22:32:36 MST

• Next message: spike66: "Re: On Hangin' On"
• Previous message: spike66: "Re: segway race: fun and games with a segway"
• In reply to: gts: "RE: What's Important to Discuss (was FRUITLESS: duck me!"
• Next in thread: gts: "RE: What's Important to Discuss (was FRUITLESS: duck me!"
• Reply: gts: "RE: What's Important to Discuss (was FRUITLESS: duck me!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

gts wrote:
> I've always enjoyed logic puzzles. If nothing else
> they are entertainment for me. Certainly they're a better use of my free
> time than watching mindless TV shows designed to please the lowest
> common denominators in society... -gts

Actually I enjoy being society's lowest
common denominator. The TV people go to
such outrageous lengths to please me.

It has its drawbacks of course. Occasionally
some yahoo comes along claiming to be a still
lower common denominator. A competition
ensues. The result is not pretty.

spike

• Next message: spike66: "Re: On Hangin' On"
• Previous message: spike66: "Re: segway race: fun and games with a segway"
• In reply to: gts: "RE: What's Important to Discuss (was FRUITLESS: duck me!"
• Next in thread: gts: "RE: What's Important to Discuss (was FRUITLESS: duck me!"
• Reply: gts: "RE: What's Important to Discuss (was FRUITLESS: duck me!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:13 MST