Re: Bill Gates and the essential un-humanistic nature of capitalism

From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Sun Nov 17 2002 - 05:50:20 MST

Next message: William: "Re: PC like a CD player --- WAS: Re: fruits of Bill Gates labor worth $50 billion. ---"
Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Oldtimer 'puter woolgathering, was Re: fruits of Bill Gates labor"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Bill Gates and the essential un-humanistic nature of capitalism"
Next in thread: Technotranscendence: "Re: Bill Gates and the essential un-humanistic nature of capitalism"
Reply: Technotranscendence: "Re: Bill Gates and the essential un-humanistic nature of capitalism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I have only been dipping into this thread, but I want to ask a general
question:

Do you believe that the only or important value of a company is its
technological innovations? (I would use value here to be economic
value, but it can also mean personal value.)

I do not, but I would like to see your answers to this question. I will
elaborate my view thereafter.

Cheers!

Dan
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/

Next message: William: "Re: PC like a CD player --- WAS: Re: fruits of Bill Gates labor worth $50 billion. ---"
Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Oldtimer 'puter woolgathering, was Re: fruits of Bill Gates labor"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Bill Gates and the essential un-humanistic nature of capitalism"
Next in thread: Technotranscendence: "Re: Bill Gates and the essential un-humanistic nature of capitalism"
Reply: Technotranscendence: "Re: Bill Gates and the essential un-humanistic nature of capitalism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:11 MST