From: Hubert Mania (humania@t-online.de)
Date: Wed Nov 13 2002 - 04:25:53 MST
Eugen said:
> Alas, no. Can't say anything about socialism, but the identity thread is
> always completely predictable, never generates any new insights, and goes
> on and on and on and on, until the delete finger is worn down to the bone.
I understand it must be boring for you, but the simple fact that people
persist in contributing to that thread shows that there must be an urge to
get to an understanding. Why don' t you work out your SHRDLU-access? Is it
really necessary to have others agree on working together on that one. Maybe
it is too hard to understand for anybody else. Maybe you can elaborate on it
alone? Sorry, if my question is naiv, but I really mean it.
> However, this is utterly dwarfed by the amount of hot air currently
> produced on wta-talk.
Same thing as with the ducks. Some people inclusing me and newbies have some
arguments about terms and interpretation that *they* feel are vital to get
cleared. Some people are open to a different picture of human essentials. To
me it's fine if you call it hot air, I can laugh about that term, but I am
not quite sure how much it really *annoys* you and if laughter about it
makes
you sick. Maybe it would be helpful if you speak up so we might see, what is
so irritating about that wta hot air and the ducks waddling about here.
Hubert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:05 MST