RE: duck me!

From: Emlyn O'regan (oregan.emlyn@healthsolve.com.au)
Date: Wed Oct 23 2002 - 19:21:33 MDT


I still say that they are both right, at least with regard to themselves.

Emlyn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jef Allbright [mailto:jef@jefallbright.net]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 9:51
> To: extropians@extropy.org
> Subject: Re: duck me!
>
>
> Hey folks, this discussion keeps twisting and turning without
> any apparent
> increase in understanding. There are some useful concepts in
> the mix, but
> it has become a seemingly endless debate on definitions of
> what we mean by a
> copy of a person. I think people can actually agree on the
> various concepts,
> but there's confusion arising because people are choosing to
> use a word
> differently depending on their values and the point they're
> trying to make.

***************************************************************************
Confidentiality: The contents of this email are confidential and are
intended only for the named recipient. If the reader of this e-mail is not
the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use, reproduction,
disclosure or distribution of the information contained in the e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to us
immediately and delete the document.
Viruses: Any loss/damage incurred by using this material is not the sender's
responsibility. Our entire liability will be limited to resupplying the
material. No warranty is made that this material is free from computer virus
or other defect.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:17:44 MST