From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Wed Oct 16 2002 - 00:00:41 MDT
FutureQ wrote:
>
>
> You're trying too hard to take my comments out of context. I merely made a
> comparison by example. Take it line by line if you must. It should be very very
> obvious to this list that certain medical technologies are under fire from a
> bunch of different religious groups. Need I name each and every one and supply
> chapter and verse of their arguments? Sorry, I won't do this. I expect this list
> to be savvy enough to understand the obvious. I expect we all have read the
> headlines. Maybe you haven't. If so then perhaps that is the problem in your
> understanding who I consider to be enemies of our movement. This can't be news to
> this list. BTW, it's Howard Bloom.
>
It is not at all "obvious" that it is religion or primarily
religion that is opposed to certain new technologies or new
technology in general. Some of those technologies are opposed
even more vigorously in some European countries where the
density of fundamentalist religious folks is far lower than in
the US. Perhaps you need to read a bit more deeply than the
"hadlines".
- samantha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:17:36 MST