From: nanowave (nanowave@shaw.ca)
Date: Fri Sep 20 2002 - 03:42:08 MDT
Amera wrote:
>(Just reading this first paragraph, sorry Lee)
>>4) Science. Please read the books, papers, literature before
>>> drilling people with questions that are answered on page 2.
>
>>Some may wonder just where this is coming from, and
>>what it's about.
>
>Why didn't you ask me, then?
>
>Your Bayesian questions, Lee. You didn't read the introductory
>materials (papers, books) otherwise you question about probability
>would be silly. You could have answered your own question about how
>Bayesian view quantum mechanics too with a five minute search. Use your
>own typing hands please. And your main point or criticism to me about
>Jaynes and EPR was something you found from somebody named nobdy who
>posted to a newsgroup. Why should I take the time (if I had it and the
>typing hands, which I do NOT) to respond to someone who didn't care
>about it enough themselves to learn about it? I've posted references
>to Bayesian books and Bayesian links before, and I answered your
>questions in earlier posts too, as well as in my response to Serafino.
>You can go to amazon and Google easier than me, I'm sure, given the
>connection, money, and time i have, (and I'm away and soon to
>be offline from the Internet for a long while too).
>
>I don't engage in conversations usually on this group because I don't
>have the typing hands (massive RSI flareup in progress presently) or
>the time or the interest in many of these topics. (Your own style of
>dialog is not something I enjoy anyways.)
>
>My interest on the extropians list is more in sharing things
>I'm learning out of this group, and that's all.
>
>
>Amara
Ok. Enough.
I would like to militate the conclusion of this thread by suggesting that
compelling evidence supporting the conjecture that *Lee is a troll* has not
been forthcoming and that his adroit treatment of what little "evidence" has
been presented has only increased my admiration for his distinctive
e-character. Thus if anyone should happen to simply not *like* his
particular style of sparking or debating an issue, then let's be upfront
about that and get on with something more interesting.
Russell Evermore
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:17:11 MST