RE: *Why* People Won't Discuss Differences Objectively

From: Rafal Smigrodzki (rms2g@virginia.edu)
Date: Tue Sep 17 2002 - 13:51:06 MDT

• Next message: walter.kehowski@gcmail.maricopa.edu: "Re: REVIEWS: The Bell Curve"
• Previous message: Amara Graps: "Re: 'token' (was Re: hey, don't be sad...)"
• In reply to: Matt Grommes: "Re: *Why* People Won't Discuss Differences Objectively"
• Next in thread: Robert J. Bradbury: "RE: *Why* People Won't Discuss Differences Objectively"
• Reply: Robert J. Bradbury: "RE: *Why* People Won't Discuss Differences Objectively"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Harvey Newstrom wrote::
> >
> > Why are these the top-ten issues on this list? Why aren't we
> >discussing the extropian principles instead? I believe that all the
> >above are off-topic and should be permanently banned. We can create
> an >alternate extropians-politics list for people who must discuss
> these >issues. But on this list, we should be discussing
> transhumanism. >
>

### I second the motion.

Rafal

• Next message: walter.kehowski@gcmail.maricopa.edu: "Re: REVIEWS: The Bell Curve"
• Previous message: Amara Graps: "Re: 'token' (was Re: hey, don't be sad...)"
• In reply to: Matt Grommes: "Re: *Why* People Won't Discuss Differences Objectively"
• Next in thread: Robert J. Bradbury: "RE: *Why* People Won't Discuss Differences Objectively"
• Reply: Robert J. Bradbury: "RE: *Why* People Won't Discuss Differences Objectively"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:17:07 MST