Re: impossibility of computer security?

From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lee@piclab.com)
Date: Tue Sep 17 2002 - 12:22:31 MDT


> (Samantha Atkins <samantha@objectent.com>):
> Wei Dai wrote:
> >I wonder if anyone is as disturbed as I am with the recent news of remote
> >exploitable holes in OpenSSH and OpenSSL that allow attackers to run
> >arbitrary code. When open-source software whose only purpose is to improve
> >computer security actually make it worse, I have to wonder if security is
> >possible at all. Has anyone thought about what causes this seeming
> >inability of human beings to write secure software, and what its
> >implications are for the future?
>
> What on earth gave you the idea that the only purpose of Open
> Source software is to make computers more secure?

Look up "restrictive relative clause" in a good English grammar book.
He's talking about specific pieces of software--SSH and SSL--whose
purpose is indeed security.

-- 
Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/>
"All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past,
are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified
for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:17:07 MST