Re: surveillance helps... GPS IMPLANTS

From: Chuck Kuecker (ckuecker@ckent.org)
Date: Wed Sep 11 2002 - 10:45:52 MDT


If anyone who wants to can opt out - what good is the implant? A mandatory
implant could be burned out by a brief pulse of RF, or the implant site
could be shielded to prevent downloads.

I also see a market for chips stolen from their rightful wearers, and used
in crimes...

Chuck Kuecker

At 09:31 09/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Rather than cameras everywhere try universal GPS implants that download
>tracking info periodically. The system then compares location of individual
>to location and time of crime and bingo.
>The issue of manditory constant exposure to RF from the devices is there.
>We currently endure passively quite a bath of RF/EMF but that does not make
>it
>a given if we choose to opt out. ei- wear a suit desgned to
>capture/redirect/shield
>RF/EMF.
>
>Draconian as it sounds, this would be simple, cheap and effective.
>
>MJ



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:57 MST