From: Extropian Agro Forestry Ventures Inc. (megao@sk.sympatico.ca)
Date: Wed Sep 11 2002 - 08:31:08 MDT
Rather than cameras everywhere try universal GPS implants that download
tracking info periodically. The system then compares location of individual
to location and time of crime and bingo.
The issue of manditory constant exposure to RF from the devices is there.
We currently endure passively quite a bath of RF/EMF but that does not make
it
a given if we choose to opt out. ei- wear a suit desgned to
capture/redirect/shield
RF/EMF.
Draconian as it sounds, this would be simple, cheap and effective.
MJ
louisnews Newstrom wrote:
> From: spike66 <spike66@attbi.com>
>
> > If we had enough overlapping timestamped video, the cops
> > could calmly drive to the place where the perp is hiding,
> > scoop up his ass and throw it in the slammer.
>
> But "enough" would have to cover the entire world! Even if the entire
> city was covered with cameras, all a criminal would have to do is drive
> out of the city. Then the situation would be just like it is now. Bank
> cameras show a guy in a mask rob the bank, and then leave your field of
> view. Only surveillence of every spot on the planet would stop this.
>
> > Assume a violent criminal gets caught 20% of
> > the time,
>
> This is not a great return from the expense of putting a camera every 10
> feet on the planet.
>
> ---
> Louis Newstrom
> louisnews@comcast.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:57 MST