From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Sat Sep 07 2002 - 14:39:43 MDT
On Saturday, September 7, 2002, at 04:15 pm, spike66 wrote:
> If one has not the means to defend
> property in this old world, it can be argued that one does not, in
> fact, own that property.
This is a very dangerous argument. This implies that anybody who can
steal your property deserves to keep it. If you did not have the means
to defend your property, it could be argued that you really didn't own
it. Surely you don't want people stealing your property on such grounds.
-- Harvey Newstrom, CISSP <www.HarveyNewstrom.com> Principal Security Consultant <www.Newstaff.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:50 MST