From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Wed Sep 04 2002 - 05:47:36 MDT
gts wrote:
>
> That is not my definition. It is yours. My definition of "immortal" (and
> Webster's) is "exempt from death."
>
> Either it will be possible in principle to be exempt from death, or it
> else it won't be possible. Hand-waving arguments about the theoretical
> probabilities of achieving immortality do not really answer the
> question.
gts, I am interested in being "exempt from death" because it would be a
good means to my end goal of "living forever". I will, however, be quite
satisfied if I actually live forever, regardless of whether I am "exempt
from death" during the process or simply have a very small but nonzero
total probability of dying over my infinite lifespan.
-- Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://singinst.org/ Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:41 MST