From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Aug 29 2002 - 16:54:32 MDT
--- Harvey Newstrom <mail@HarveyNewstrom.com> wrote:
> in them. I don't know what speech you claim was impeded. What
> exactly
> was the message that was suppressed here? What exact political claim
>
> was disputed and covered-up. This is a conspiracy theory with no
> story. I see punishment for indecent exposure and related crimes. I
> > don't see any speech suppression. Could you be a little more
> specific about what exact statements or message was suppressed?
Frankly I am shocked that it turns out that I am on the more liberal
end of the debate than Harvey. The concept of "indecent exposure" as a
crime is as much a legislation of morality as legislation declaring
sodomy to be a crime. I know that Harvey is against the latter being
illegal, but why id he for the former, an act which most people would
consider to be a less serious act. I had no idea Harvey was a clothes
prude.
If a woman can't walk down the street with her shirt off, how do you
ever expect to get equal rights for gays?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:31 MST